T  W  I  N       C  I  T  I  E  S       C  R  E  A  T  I  O  N       S  C  I  E  N  C  E       A  S  S  O  C  I  A  T  I  O  N

TCCSA may not necessarily endorse all material presented at meetings announced on this page,
but feels that they would be of interest to creationists.

This is a supplimental home page, created to decrease download time.
For the main home page, click HERE.

Annual TCCSA Writing Contest
Deadline May 15

The winners invited to post their papers on the web site.
TCCSA may not necessarily endorse all the opinions expressed in the papers posted.

You May View Past Papers In PDF

"Are Birds Surviving Dinosaurs" by Annabelle L., winner in the May 2016 contest
"Horse Evolution on Trial" by Veronica Faye, winner in the May 2013 contest
"Through His Handiwork" by 12 year old writing contest winner Isaiah Durand presented at TCCSA meeting 3/20/2012.
"The Greatest of Creatures" by 14 year old writing contest winner Geneva Durand presented at TCCSA meeting 10/18/2011.
"The Truth About Giants" by Adam Schwartzbauer, 2010 11th Grader who read the abridged version of his paper "The Truth About Giants"at the July, 2010 meeting.
Adam's Complete Giants PowerPoint
For critiques by Dr. Clyde Billington and Joe Taylor, go to our articles page.

"The Incredible Ica Stones of Peru" by Adam Schwartzbauer, 2009 10th Grader who read his paper at the September, 2009 meeting.
"Flood Stories Around the World" by Andrew Williams, 2008 Fifth Grader who read his paper at the January 2009 meeting.
"Cellular Reproduction" by Alyssa Pagel, 2008 Ninth Grader who read her paper at the November 2008 meeting.
"Whales" by Mitchell Pagel, 2008 Seventh Grader, who read his paper at the October 2008 meeting.
"Facts on Earth" by Francie Volk, 2008 Fourth Grader who read her paper at the 9/16/08 meeting.
"Platypuses and How They Defy Evolutionists" by Claire Ensminger, 2007 Eighth Grader Winner who read her paper at the 1/15/08 meeting.
Beetles by Mitchell Pagel, 6th Grade Winner of The 2007 TCCSA Writing Contest, presented at the 11/20/07 meeting.
Did Man Live With Dinosaurs? by Brooke Lodien, 7th Grade Winner of The 2007 TCCSA Writing Contest, presented at the 10/16/07 meeting.
Are Dinosaurs Still Alive by Max Lodien, 8th Grade Winner of The 2007 TCCSA Writing Contest, presented at the 9/18/07 meeting.
Did God Really Create Man? by Emily Hannan, 9 year old winner of 2007 TCCSA Writing Contest, presented at the 7/17/07 Meeting
"The Geologic Column" by Jonathan Cox, a 2007 Winner who read his paper at the 6/19/07 meeting.
"Evidence of Intelligent Design: Birds" by Claire Ensminger, 2006 Seventh Grader Winner who read her paper at the 7/18/06 meeting.
Refuting The Big Bang Theory by Victoria Kasten, 2006 9th Grade Winner, who read her paper at the 9/19/06 meeting.
"A Subhuman?" by 2005 Ninth Grade Winning Student C. C.

For More Information On The Contest, Click HERE

Vast ages not needed to produce gems
Opals form in weeks

"The Evolutionary Dynamics of Digital and Nucleotide Codes: A Mutation Protection Perspective"

Willaim DeJong writes of a newly published study: "The article refers to the largely unknown fact that both digital codes (computer programs) and nucleotide codes (DNA) are protected against mutations. The article concludes that living nature continuously adapts to changing circumstances by gene-regulation and the recombination of gene variants ('alleles') and selection. These mechanisms for random change and selection neither produce new alleles nor expand the length of the nucleotide code, and operate within the boundaries of mutation protection."

For the review and the links, click HERE.

The Dark side od Charles Darwin
Jerry Bergman, who writes faster than most people read, has written
"The Dark Side of Charles Darwin:
A Critical Analysis of an Icon of Science"

A Review by Ross Olson

You Missed

"The Science of the Flood:
And Why We Care"

by Ross Olson

But The Videos Featured Can Be Viewed On Line
For Links Click HERE.

Lyn Griffin
Griffin Communications
Lyndon Griffin, Historian, Lecturer
and former TCCSA Board Mamber
Now has a web site.
For details, click HERE
His lectures include the Scopes Trial

Fox 9 News broadcast a brief debate

TV's "The Science Guy," Bill Nye, claimed in a video clip that evolution doubters endanger US scientific future and it is harmful to teach this to children. See it.

Board member Ross Olson, retired pediatrician was invited to discuss the issue with National Geographic Blogger, Greg Laden, live and on screen for about 8 minutes Monday. See It

This was followed by discussion on Greg Laden's Blog "In Partnership with National Geographic" See It

Star Tribune published an Article Favorable to Creation

  • "How I Evolved Into A Young Earth Creationist" by Ross Olson. My personal journey through skepticism back to Biblical creation, this time backed by scientific evidence. This was published by the Star Tribune on 8/1/2012. Click HERE

    A responder in California stated that this proves the media in Minnesota are controlled by conservatives!!

    Europe Is Skeptical About Evolution
    "Darwin and the Return of the Alchemists" by Wim M. de Jong, a Dutch consultant and researcher who sees no hope for evolution theory.

    See The Amazing Animation From Kids4Truth

    Adventure Safaris Logo

    To See Russ In Action Teaching About Glaciers
    Click HERE (Note: It is 3MB)


    Outer Space
    "Life in Outer Space: Just Add Water?"

    For An Article On This Subject By Ross Olson, Click HERE

    For An Article On This Subject By Optical Engineer Dave Stoltzman, Click HERE.

    Want To See One Of the Most Popular Articles On The Internet Concerning Evolution?
    Evolution: A Conservapedia Article

    Answers In Genesis
    Answers In Genesis Museum Got A Reaction From Opponents

    The New York Times features an article that reports the technical and artistic excellence of the museum, located just across the Kentucky border from Cincinnati, but expresses amazement at the worldview. After a reasonable description of the experience, the writer ends with puzzlement that scientific evidence is offered -- obviously assuming that Christian belief is a leap in the dark. Then he makes what he assumes to be the "gotcha" point that if miracles are allowed, then we have a chaotic universe. Hopefully the "cognitive dissonance" that results from seeing that bright talented people have these "strange beliefs" will cause many to reconsider their prejudices.

    For the New York Times article, click HERE.
    For Answers in Genesis Web Site, click HERE.
    For a letter to the Star Tribune, click HERE.

    Institute for Creation ResearchCreation Research Society align=
    Creation Research Society align=
    Surprisingly, It Is Radiometric Dating
    That Contradicts Old Earth Chronology
    To See information On The RATE Project, Click HERE.

    Kansas Science Standards 2005
    Are We Really In Kansas Anymore?
    Was It The Wicked Witch? The Wizard?
    Or Did They Change Venue To "Alice In Wonderland?"
    Please Click HERE

    Apologetics Press
    Evolutionists Frequently Point To Theistic Evolutionists As Proof That Evolution Is No Threat To Religion
    For A Look At Militant Atheism, Click HERE

    Can anybody notice the problem in the following statement? Eugenie Scott wrote: "To scientists, using God to explain natural phenomena of any kind violates the practice of methodological naturalism, in which scientific explanations are limited only to natural causes." (Hint: Does science encompass all of reality?)

    The Kansas 2005 Hearings contain this statement by Mr. John Calvert: "A philosophy professor at Concordia University of Wisconsin was asked about scientists who have theistic beliefs and also accept evolution. This is what he said: 'The mere fact that you have somebody who holds two beliefs, A and B, does not show that they are logically consistent.' He went on to say, 'It might be that some of these people are confused.' And you will remember the significant number of people walking around here wearing a tag that said 'confused' after that statement."

    Who Is Your Creator
    There was a large billboard questioning evolution near Washington Avenue & Interstate 35W in downtown Mineapolis.
    It earned a Star Tribune editorial stating that "evolution is a fact." It is a high honor to irritate those guardians of political correctness.

    For more information, click www.whoisyourcreator.com.

    Ironically, this billboard stands just before the bridge that collapsed on August 1, 2007. Were the victims just cosmic accidents or creations of a loving God, Whom they had either accepted or rejected prior to their sudden demise?

    TCCSA Webmaster Ross Olson evolved!!

    ...from an evolutionist to a creationist! Of course, evolutionists would call that a deleterious mutation. But wouldn't even that prove the point!?
    Click HERE for more details.


    Did Noah have a library?
    For an article, click HERE.

    Sickle Cell
    Does Sickle Cell Resistence To Malaria Demonstrate Evolution?

    For an e-mail debate Dr. Kevin Anderson had with evolutionist Dr. Carl Zimmer, (whose original article was a response to Dr. Anderson's radio broadcast) click HERE

    e Creation Science Academy
    John Nuckols'
    e Creation Science Academy
    Providing Home School Science Instruction For Central Minnesota
    E-mail jpnuckols{at}usfamily.net
    Also Sponsors Dissection Camps
    Click HERE for more information.

    The Romans One Test

    Romans One indicates that the existence of God and something of His nature are so apparent from the things He has made that those who fail to recognize it are "without excuse." In fact, the passage states that they are actually "suppressing the truth." In what ought to be frightening to those who are doing it, Paul, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, writes that this places the offenders under "the wrath of God."

    Now, of course, atheists think they have nothing to fear since they do not believe in God. Romans One, however, tells us that God does not believe in atheists - at least honest atheists - because He states that the evidence for His existence, eternal power and divine nature is plain in creation, and only avoided by active suppression.

    Yet there are Christians - who ought to know better - that still endorse a cosmology indistinguishable from that of an atheistic thinker. In other words, they agree with everything mainstream materialistic science comes up with but simply say, "God did it like this."

    Click HERE To Read The Whole Article

    Evolutionary Instruction Is Scholastic

    Proponents of evolution, claiming to be products of the Enlightenment, have actually reverted to the pre-modern mode of instruction. At the time Francis Bacon defined modern experimental science, the Universities were dominated by Aristotelian Scholastics. This hold was so strong that independent Natural Philosophy Societies had to be started to provide a forum for the new thinking.

    In the Universities, students were given, as authoritative, the teachings of the Greeks, mainly Aristotle, and deviation was not tolerated. Science was done by starting with a "known" principle, performing deductive reasoning from that principle (essentially "thought experiments") and finally selecting examples from nature to illustrate - not prove - the point.

    Ironically, evolutionists, instead of continuing the Baconian legacy of observation, hypothesis, experimentation and modification, have reinstituted the Scholastic format. Students are authoritatively taught "the fact of evolution." They may be given "thought experiments" such as "describe the selective advantage of flight." They may then select examples from nature that illustrate that point.

    Their actual philosophy is less like Aristotle (who believed in cause and effect) than some of the others, like Epicurus (who believed that atoms have the innate power of "swerve" -- the ancient "uncertainty principle") and Pythagoras (who seemed to nearly worship nature and think that it was essentially mathematical).

    No amount of contrary evidence is considered enough to re-consider the basic proposition of evolution because it is accepted on authority. The data are not examined systematically but only as they support the hypothesis.

    So who are the "pseudo-scientists" after all?

    Ross S. Olson

    Watch For It
    Classical Physics vs Modern Physics Seminar
    For more Information, Click HERE.

    Should Intelligent Design be taught in the schools?

    See Intelligent Design and the Public Schools Talk by Ross Olson
    A paper given at a town meeting for select high school students at the University of Minnesota on January 4, 2006.

    See Intelligent Design And The Jewish Schools by Ross Olson
    A paper given at a meeting of the Jewish Community Relations Council on March 9, 2006.

    See Intelligent Design And The Public Schools Article A version of the talk suitable for use as an article by Ross Olson

    Haldane's Dilemma
    A Genius Was Disturbed
    Should Lesser Evolutionists Worry, Too?
    Click HERE to find out.

    Dan Nuckols

    Looks At The Creation -- Evolution Controversy Along With The Whole Monkey's Cuz Crew At Wannabe High School
    God does Not Beleive in Atheists
    For More Of Dan's Work, Click HERE
    Dan's Pulpit

    Apologetics Press
    "Was Darwin Wrong?"
    Asked National Geographic
    And, of course, they answered in the negative...
    But in fact, Darwin WAS wrong
    And National Geographic Is Even More Wrong!
    Because The Evidence Is Now So Compelling
    That Dawin Himself Might Have Changed His Mind
    For More Information, click HERE
    And Also Go To The Website Of Apologetics Press

    What does {at} have to do with {at} ?
    Because internet spamers search for and collect e-mail addresses from web sites,
    we are changing the addresses that appear on this site.

    anybody{at}something.net becomes anybody{at}something.net
    This should fool the robots for a while, but if you are a human, just replace the {at} with a {at}.

    Weigh the Evidence
    For a printable poster with a challenge to

    "Weigh the Evidence,"
    click HERE.

  • Definition of Evolution

    Recently evolutionists have retreated from defending abiogenesis and claim that it has never been considered part of evolution. (It is interesting that this has happened after creationists effectively showed the physical impossibility of life arising by natural processes.) Yet this has not always been the case.

    George Gaylord Simpson wrote: "Evolution is a fully natural process, inherent in the physical properties of the universe, by which life arose in the first place and by which all living things, past or present, have since developed, divergently and progressively" ("The World Into Which Darwin Led Us," Science, 1960, p. 969).

    And, of course, for those who want to defend a materialistic world view, it is absolutely essential that there be a non-supernatural origin of life, and indeed of matter, energy and time, whether they want to include it under "evolution" or give it a separate name.

    If they say "we have no theory of the natural origin of life," then it means that the only other choice -- a supernatural origin -- must be the working hypothesis.

    Creation ResearchSociety

    POLLEN PROBLEMS (For the evolutionist!)

    In the 1980's, Creation Research Society repeated and confirmed the earlier research of Clifford Burdick, finding intact pollen in the PreCambrian strata of the Grand Canyon, which according to standard chronology should have had no flowering plants. They also found 200 million years missing with the layers above and below the missing strata interbedded (blending) and no erosion. This means their deposition was continuous without any significant gap of time.

    See the articles in pdf format by clicking HERE.

    Have A Creation Question?

    1. Search this site for key words. There are many articles, debates and letters.

    2. Look at the Links page and search the major sites (marked with an *).
    There are about 135 sites linked.

    3. Click "Research Help" then "Other Resources" to find articles, books, debates, letters, reviews and videos on the Resources page for ideas.

    Great Works
    Bryce Gaudian: Great Works Catalog

    Creation Videos, Books, Music, Artifacts and Art

    Click HERE for the first half of the Catalog. (2.5 MB) Click HERE for the second half of the Catalog. (2.5 MB)
    Click HERE for the first page of the order form. Click HERE for the second page of the order form.

    C. S. Lewis

    There are all sorts of different reasons for believing in God, and here I will mention only one. It is this. Supposing there was no intelligence behind the universe, no creative mind. In that case nobody designed my brain for the purpose of thinking. It is merely that when the atoms inside my skull happen for physical or chemical reasons to arrange themselves in a certain way, this gives me as a by-product, the sensation I call thought. But if so, how can I trust my own thinking to be true? It is like upsetting a milk-jug and hoping that the way the splash arranges itself will give you a map of London. But if I cannot trust my own thinking, of course I cannot trust the arguments leading to atheism and therefore the reason to be an atheist, or anything else. Unless I believe in God, I cannot believe in thought or anything else: so I can never use thought to disbelieve in God.

    C. S. Lewis

    This is a supplimental home page, created to decrease download time.
    For the main home page, click HERE